Hypothesis
As the
hypothesis for this experiment, we expect that the higher the spray pressure
and the lower amount of gallons sprayed, the more drift there will be.
The goal of our experiment is to determine what type of nozzles have the
least amount of drift on average (flat fan, Turbo TeeJet, air induction).
We also want to determine if it is worthwhile to upgrade to the more expensive
and newly developed air induction nozzles, opposed to staying with the
cheaper and more recognizable extended range or flat fan nozzles.
Procedure
Below
is a table of the types of nozzles that were used in our experiment:
| 0.15 gallons | 0.20 gallons | 0.30 gallons | 0.80 gallons |
| XR110015VS | XR11002VS | XR11003VS | XR11008VS |
| TT110015-VP | TT11002-VP | TT11003-VP | TT11008-VP |
| AI110015-VS | AI11002-VS | AI11003-VS | AI11008-VS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first
step in this experiment was to set up the area where the nozzles were tested.
We tested the nozzles with our ATV sprayer set, as shown in the picture
below:
|
|
|
When we set up the spray unit for the experiment, we made sure that the distance of the air hose (wind) was the same distance (12 inches) and angle from the nozzle for each trial. The temperature in the shop was set at 59ºF / 15ºC, to stimulate ideal spraying conditions (night spraying). We also made sure that the boom height was the same (around 22 inches) for every observation.
Observations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusion
As the
conclusion for this experiment, we found the nozzles that sprayed the less
liquid drifted more than the nozzles that sprayed more. We also found
that spray drift was more common as the spray pressure increased, but not
with the Air Induction (AI) nozzles. Therefore, the XR TeeJet nozzles
drifted the most on average, with the Turbo TeeJet nozzles drifting the
second most drift, and the Air Induction nozzles drifting the lowest amount
of mist. These nozzles seemed to have the same drift measurements
under all spray pressures. The Air Induction nozzles seemed to work
better under higher spray pressures, while the XR TeeJet (Flat Tip) nozzles
seemed to operate better under lower spray pressures. For most spraying
uses, the normal XR TeeJet nozzles might be the best, because most farmers
do not need them for crops that require higher spray pressures, unlike
custom spraying (the higher the PI pressure, the faster the application
time). These nozzles are also the cheapest, at around $3.50 per nozzle
tip (or less), and are readily available in most rural areas. The
Air Induction nozzles worked the best under averaged conditions, but they
cost around $10.00 per nozzle tip, and are hard to get a hold of.
Under specific circumstances, however, the performance of the nozzles varied.
Under conditions where the wind speed does not exceed 20 mph, the Turbo
TeeJet nozzles appear to perform the most ideal, with the least amount
of drift out of the three nozzle types (at a cost of around $5.00 per nozzle
tip).
Ideally,
most sprayers have a 90 foot boom width. Since nozzles are spaced
20 inches apart, that means that there would be around 54 spray nozzles/caps
on the sprayer. The cost of just buying the nozzle tips for the sprayer
(not including the cap or filter, and taxes) would be around $190.00 for
XR TeeJet nozzles, and $540.00 for the AI TeeJet nozzles. A difference
of $350.00 is merely a drop in the bucket, compared to the cost of spray
and other agricultural inputs. Therefore, the cost of the nozzle
tips should not be used factor in determining what nozzle tip to purchase.
One may also point out, that it is very unethical to spray in winds above
10 mph, because of the risk in damaging the neighbor's crop.
With
all this said, we have concluded that for custom spraying, the best choice
would be to purchase air induction nozzles. However, the use of air
induction nozzles should not be needed in spraying. For the application
of pesticides under perfect, no wind conditions, the use of regular extended
range nozzles is sufficient (because the finer mist of these nozzles make
better contact for the spray of the pesticide, compared to the courser
droplets of air induction nozzles). Depending on the spray application,
it is important to note, that all nozzles have practical uses which make
them outperform the other nozzle types (contact, systemic contact, etc.).
Return to Main Page